Japan - Hotel Management Agreements


For a pdf of the full brochure please email Hospitality.Leisure@dlapiper.com



1. Are Hotel Management Agreements (HMAs) common in your jurisdiction?

Yes, particularly in the upscale and luxury market. Competition in the market has led certain operators to couple management agreements with investments in the underlying asset.

2. If not HMAs, what are the alternatives/what is commonly used?

Lease agreements are well entrenched in the market, often as a result of owners' financing requirements. Hybrid leases – leases that contain elements of management agreements – are common between local owners and international hotel operators and allow the parties to share the risks and upside of hotel operations, including by pegging rental fees to revenue, gross operating profit (GOP), or a combination of the two. Franchise agreements have gained popularity with some international hotel operators in recent years, but are normally reserved for owners (or operators) with successful track records in operating a hotel.

3. Is it common or usual for the HMA to be governed by (i) local laws; (ii) the laws of one of the parties' country of incorporation; or (iii) an alternative jurisdiction?

It depends on each case. Japanese laws are sometimes used in HMAs.

4. Are there any significant or unusual points to note in respect of tax on HMA payments in your jurisdiction?

HMA payments are usually subject to consumption tax (shohi-zei) (currently 8 percent, but expected to increase to 10 percent from October 2019).

Term and Termination

5. Is there a standard contract period of an HMA?

Yes, 20-30 years for luxury and upscale brands; 15-20 years for budget and midscale brands.

6. Is the term usually fixed?Are early exit or similar options included (contractual or implied)?

Yes, the term is usually fixed. Early exit options are normally limited to contract and specifically owners’ breach of the HMA or operators' failure to achieve performance tests for several years. Implied termination rights (for convenience) are not common.

7. Is it usual to include fees/liquidated damages for early termination?

Yes. Liquidated damages are generally enforceable in Japan and are often agreed (especially for the benefit of the operator) in an HMA. Amounts will vary widely across brand and location (there are cases where liquidated damages equivalent to 1 to 3 times management fees for the remaining contract period are provided for). Some owners and operators prefer not to stipulate a pre-determined amount, however, and allow damages to be determined by the courts or arbitral panel, as the case may be.

8. What is the usual position in respect of renewal?

Renewal is usually by the mutual written agreement of the parties. A renewal period depends on several factors, e.g., the initial period, performance of the hotel in the initial period.


9. Is there a standard fee structure for HMAs (e.g. base + incentive)?

Fees vary depending on brand, operator and hotel location. The standard position is for a base fee pegged to total revenue and an incentive fee pegged to GOP.

10. What other fees and charges are there (such as royalties, accounting, marketing, license fees, etc.)?

License fees (normally a percentage of total revenue), centralized services fee (based on the services provided), and marketing service fees (based on either gross room revenue or total revenue).

11.Are owners typically required to set aside funds for fixtures and fittings?

Yes. This may be on a fully notional or partially notional basis. This is a point which, among others, the parties negotiate heavily.

Performance and Operations

12. What is the usual standard imposed on an operator in respect of the operation of the hotel?

The standard is normally to operate the hotel commensurate to the standards of other hotels in the same class in Japan. Most operators will hold themselves out as independent contractors, and accordingly any fiduciary duties owed to the owner should be set out in the HMA.

13. What performance measures are commonly used in your jurisdiction?

Either or both of the GOP Test and the RevPAR Test. The GOP Test, where achievement is measured against the hotel's budgeted profitability, is most common.

14. Is an operator or owner guarantee common in your jurisdiction?

An operator guarantee is uncommon; these guarantees are sometimes seen for prime properties, but even then it is common for operators to have clawback rights (i.e. to be able to deduct payments made under the guarantee against future surplus profits). An owner performance guarantee is commonly sought when the owning entity under the HMA does not hold title to the real estate.

15. What is the usual position in respect of employees?With whom does the liability for the employees sit?

The owner is usually liable for the employees and is the employer of hotel employees. Some operators employ senior management of the hotel.

16. Is it usual to have a non-compete clause, e.g. that no other property with that brand can open within a certain radius?

Yes. The area and the term depend on each case.

17. Who is responsible for insurance?

Owner. Operator will seek to obtain operational insurances (in the Owner's name and as operational expenses).

18. Does the HMA give rights in real estate in your jurisdiction?


19.Does the HMA need to be recorded against the property, if this is possible in your jurisdiction?

No. Record of an HMA against the property is not possible.

20. Where financing is taken is it standard to obtain a Non-Disturbance Agreement (NDA) as part of a management or lease agreement?

It depends on each case. But, it is not common in Japan for a bank to agree to an NDA.

21. What other agreements usually sit alongside an HMA in your jurisdiction?

Variation of a (Brand) License Agreement and Technical Consultancy Agreement, and depending on the operator, a Centralized Services and Marketing Agreement.

Transfers and Assignments

22. What are the standard rights/restrictions in respect of transfer/sale of the hotel?

Operators will require consent to any change in the ownership structure, and consent can be withheld for a number of reasons, including if the owner fails the operator's compliance checks or is deemed a competitor of the operator.

23. When a managed hotel is sold (either asset or share deal), is it usual in your jurisdiction that either the Operator's consent is required for the sale, or that the hotel may only be sold if the HMA transfers with the hotel?

Usually the operator’s consent is required for a sale of the hotel. Most operators will require a termination fee if the owner is allowed to terminate the HMA upon sale to a third party. Often this termination fee is an amount equal to the average annual management fees earned multiplied by the remaining years under the HMA.

24. Do HMAs commonly include a right of first refusal for the operator to purchase the hotel?

No, it is not common.

25. Is it usual to include provisions which enable the sale of the property with vacant possession i.e. without the brand?

Sale with vacant possession would usually be subject to the operator’s consent. There will be an exit fee (or compensation fee) owed to the operator should an owner exit from the HMA in such cases.

For a pdf of the full brochure please email Hospitality.Leisure@dlapiper.com

Return to Overview page