APA and MAP Country Guide 2018
New paths ahead for international tax controversy

By:
APA and MAP Country Guide 2018 - New paths ahead for international tax controversy

The OECD BEPS project has brought significant changes to the international tax system and the regulation of cross border transactions in particular. The OECD has recognised that these changes will lead to an increase in controversy, and has encouraged dispute resolution through the mutual agreement procedure (MAP), and dispute prevention through advance pricing agreements (APAs).

The use of APAs and MAP is likely to become increasingly relevant for taxpayers as countries come under more and more pressure from the OECD to resolve their MAP cases within the 24 month period prescribed under the BEPS Action 14. It is therefore essential that multinational enterprises (MNEs) have strategies in place such as these to manage disputes, or prevent them from arising in the first place. Taxpayers should, if they have not already done so, reconsider their use of these tools in a proactive strategy fit for the post BEPS environment.

Faced with uncertainty and/or double taxation, the decision of whether an APA is appropriate or whether to pursue MAP will of course be unique for every company, country, and transaction. A number of factors should be considered, including strategic considerations and local knowledge beyond the stated rules. As a result of recent developments, and as tax authorities interact ever more closely with each other, there are new paths ahead that make entering into an APA and accessing MAP the favourable strategy for taxpayers.

We trust you will find this guide to be a valuable resource, please reach out to local DLA Piper tax contacts to discuss this or other related topics further.

Please contact us here to request a hard copy of the guide.


We have updated our guide, please read the new guide here

DOWNLOADS

Download the full APA & MAP Country Guide 2018

Download individual country chapters

Albania Australia Austria
Belgium Canada China
Colombia Croatia Czech Republic
Denmark Finland France
Georgia Germany Hong Kong
Hungary India Indonesia
Ireland Israel Italy
Jamaica (new) Japan Korea (new)
Luxembourg Mexico Morocco
Netherlands New Zealand Norway
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Singapore
South Africa (new) Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan (China) (new) Thailand
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Vietnam