• Representation of  Alberta Utilities Commission proceedings
  • Representation of various organizations undergoing high profile financial and governance investigations.
  • Defence of many organizations in high-value construction losses (ranging from 5MM to 250MM losses)
  • Representation of an airline in a high profile judicial review of an RFP process valued at $1B. Complex, multi-party action with an injunction, two appeals, seven applications, media and political management.
  • Representation of a school board in a high--profile judicial review proceeding.
  • Representation of directors and officers in a high-profile $125 million claim involving Companies Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings, multijurisdictional securities commission proceedings and multijurisdictional class action proceedings, including a precedent-setting decision by the Alberta Securities Commission in respect of a stay of proceedings, upheld on appeal.
  • Representation of a beneficiary in one of Alberta’s largest estates, including a successful and precedent setting decision at the Alberta Court of Appeal respecting the enforceability of No Contest Clauses.
  • Successful extrication of the insurers from multiple complex actions for $10 million under a financial advisor’s E&O policy for a failure to cooperate on the part of the insured. Defence legal fees expended by our client prior to our involvement was in excess of $1.5 million.
  • Katrina has been counsel in many published decision, most recently including:
    • Iron Creek Group Inc. v. Registrar of Corporations (Alberta), 2021 ABQB 872
    • AUC Ruling in Proceeding 23778, Application 23778-A002 - Ruling on the res judicata application, clarification on Form RP5 requirements, and ruling on supplemental confidentiality request, February 21, 2021
    •  AUC Ruling in Proceeding 23778 Application 23778-A002 - Ruling on TransAlta Corporation’s third confidentiality motion, August 20, 2020
    •  AUC Ruling in Proceeding 23778 Application 23778-A002 - Ruling on TransAlta Corporation’s third confidentiality motion - Ruling on motion for further and better information request responses, July 7, 2020
    •  AUC Ruling in Proceeding 23778 Application 23778-A002 - Ruling on TransAlta Corporation motion for confidentiality - May 26, 2020
    •  AUC Ruling in Proceeding 23778 Application 23778-A002 - Ruling on TransAlta Corporation’s for confidentiality - March 3, 2020
    • Meyer v. Calgary Board of Education, [2019] A.J. No. 18 ‎
    • Re Lutheran Church-Canada, the Alberta-British Columbia District, 2019 ABASC 43
    • Mawhinney v Scobie, 2019 ABCA 76
    • Martinez v. Chaffin et. al., 2018 ABCA 244
    • Architectural Millwork & Door Installations Inc. v. Provincial Store Fixtures Ltd., 2017 ABQB 390
    • Anderson Estate (Re), 2016 ABQB 683
    • ET v Rocky Mountain Play Therapy Institute Inc, 2016 ABCA 320