If you have problems viewing this email, you can
view it as a web page.
DLA Piper - QUARTERLY GOVERNANCE REVIEW

 

Q1 2016: FOCUS ON THE REGULATORS – IS MORE ENFORCEMENT ON
THE WAY?

The big governance news this quarter primarily comes from the SEC, which appears to be forecasting future enforcement actions in several areas critical to corporate governance. In this issue of Quarterly Governance Review, we take a concise look at some of these areas, and we offer you action items to consider as you review your business strategies.

Welcome to Spring.


NON-GAAP MEASURES – EXPECTING AN SEC CRACKDOWN

During the past few months, members of the SEC staff have been foreshadowing a renewed focus on enforcement of reporting of financial metrics, and the use of “non-GAAP” financial measures by companies in the capital raising process, in quarterly earnings releases and on analyst calls. This renewed focus is leading to new policy statements on the regulatory front, and we expect it to lead to new enforcement actions, which could also impact risk in civil litigation.

The regulatory regime governing the use of non-GAAP financial measures has not changed much since the SEC adopted Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K in 2003. But over the course of the past six months, the SEC staff has repeatedly voiced its concern that the increased use of non-GAAP measures may be confusing to investors and analysts.

Find out more and see our action items.


GENDER PAY GAP – A NEW FRONTIER?

Stockholder proposals regarding gender pay equality have been proposed at several large companies during this year’s proxy season, particularly among technology companies.

Companies should be aware that these types of proposals are gaining more traction, and interest from the media, and plan accordingly.

Learn more.


NEED SOME “SPECIFICITY” IN YOUR PROXY CARD?

The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has issued a new interpretation related to the form of proxy requirements. The interpretation relates to the specificity with which an issuer must describe a Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposal on its proxy card.

The SEC staff noted that the proxy card should clearly identify and describe the specific action on which shareholders are being asked to vote.

Find out more and see the SEC’s thoughts on “bad” vs. “good” descriptions.


FASB MODIFIES ACCOUNTING RULES FOR STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has made updates to share-based accounting policies in its Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09. The amendments impact the accounting of excess tax benefits, certain minimum statutory withholding requirements, elections with regard to the accounting of forfeitures, and certain other share-based accounting rules.

The ASU simplifies employee share-based accounting for both public and private organizations.

See our alert.


SEC CONTINUES TO FOCUS ON INTERNAL CONTROL FAILURES

The SEC has settled charges against Texas-based oil company Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (MHR) and several individuals. The SEC allegations related to deficient evaluation of MHR’s internal controls over financial reporting as well as failures to maintain internal control over financial reporting.

As noted by the Director for the SEC’s Fort Worth regional office, this proceeding “emphasizes that all those involved in ICFR assessments – companies, management, external auditors and consultants – must take their responsibilities seriously and rigorously assess controls, including those over financial reporting.”

The message from the SEC staff based on this proceeding and other recent speeches is clear: it is important to evaluate the severity of a control deficiency to determine whether it is a material weakness.

Find out more.


THE SILICON VALLEY INITIATIVE – UNICORNS IN
SEC’S LINE OF SIGHT: ACTION ITEMS

SEC Chair Mary Jo White and a delegation of officials from the SEC traveled to Silicon Valley in early spring to deliver a shot across the bow to technology and healthcare businesses, entrepreneurs, investors and their advisers.

In a speech delivered at the Stanford Law School’s Rock Center on Corporate Governance on March 31, SEC Chair White announced the SEC’s Silicon Valley Initiative, warning that “unicorns” with sky-high valuations merit special scrutiny and noting her concern that such companies maintain internal controls and investor protections appropriate for their promised projected growth.

Find out more.


CONTRIBUTORS

Sanjay Shirodkar

David P. Lewis

Louis Lehot

Sarah E. Ritter

Rita Patel

Rachel B. Cowen

James V. Telfer

Brittany McCants

David Hurst

 

MAY 2016


IN THIS ISSUE

Q1 2016: focus on the regulators

Non-GAAP measures –expecting an SEC crackdown

Gender pay gap – a new frontier?

Need some “specificity” in your proxy card?

FASB modifies accounting rules

SEC continues to focus on internal control failures

The Silicon Valley Initiative – unicorns in SEC’s line of sight

Contributors

LINKS


DLAPiper.com »

Our Locations »

Corporate Governance »

CONTACTS


To learn more about our corporate governance work across the United States, please contact:

Sanjay Shirodkar
Co-Chair, Public Company and Corporate Governance Practice

David P. Lewis

Louis Lehot

TRENDING NOW


Treasury’s §385 proposals go far beyond targeting inversions

MORE FROM DLA PIPER


Canadian private placements: new harmonized form means more reporting requirements

SUBSCRIBE


Would you like to receive other DLA Piper publications? Please visit this page to sign up.

FOLLOW US


Click to follow us on Twitter   Click to follow us on LinkedIn   Click to follow us on Facebook   Click to follow us on YouTube   Click to follow us on Flickr
 

Published by DLA Piper LLP (US)
Copyright © 2016 DLA Piper LLP (US)
All Rights Reserved

This bulletin is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended, and should not be used, as a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. Pursuant to applicable Rules of Professional Conduct, it may constitute advertising.

Circular 230 Notice: In compliance with US Treasury Regulations, please be advised that any tax advice given herein (or in any attachment) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed herein.

You are receiving this communication because you are a valued client or friend of DLA Piper.

DLA Piper is an international legal practice including DLA Piper LLP (US) and its affiliated entities. DLA Piper lawyers provide services in the US through DLA Piper LLP (US) and outside the US through DLA Piper UK LLP and affiliated entities. For further information please refer to www.dlapiper.com/global/about/overview/. A list of offices across Asia, Europe and the US can be found at www.dlapiper.com.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, reply to this message with REMOVE in the subject line.

www.dlapiper.com