• Robertson v. Thomson Corp. (SCC File No. 30644/C38148) – representing the plaintiffs in this class action lawsuit at the Supreme Court of Canada in a successful appeal relating to substantive issues of copyright in respect of articles written by freelance authors and reproduced by newspaper publishers in electronic form.
  • Edibles Arrangements LLC v. Vaav et al (Federal Court File No. T-218-18) – representing a leading franchisor in an industrial design and trademark infringement suit against an online infringer, and successful obtaining default judgment, damages, and transfer of the domain names at issue.
  • Stargrove Entertainment Inc. v. Universal Music Canada Inc. et al. (Competition Tribunal CT-2015-09) – representing the applicant in a successful application for leave before the Competition Tribunal relating to the refusal of mechanical copyright licenses.
  • BMW Canada Inc. v. Nissan Canada Inc. (Federal Court File No. T-1395-05) – representing BMW AG and BMW Canada Inc. in a trademark infringement action relating to the trademark M in association with luxury performance vehicles. 
  • SOCAN v. Bell Canada et al (SCC File No. 33800) – representing two interveners (CanLII and Federation of Law Societies of Canada) before the Supreme Court of Canada in successfully advocating for a large and liberal interpretation of research and the analysis of the purpose of fair dealing from the perspective of the ultimate user.
  • GlaxoSmithKline SA v. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Federal Court File No. T-2113-06) – representing Novartis Vaccines in a patent impeachment action relating to their patent on adjuvant compositions and related vaccines.
  • Voltige Inc. v. Cirque X Inc. (Federal Court File No. T-830-06) – successfully defending a motion for an interlocutory injunction based on the trademark infringement allegations relating to use of AVAIA mark in association with horse shows.
  • Omniglass Ltd. v. Wojick et al. (Ont. Sup. Ct) – representing Omniglass in a trade secret lawsuit relating to pultrusion technology.
  • Creative Matters Inc. v. Korhani of Canada Inc. (Federal Court File No. T-726-11) – representing Creative Matters, the copyright owner and a leading Canadian carpet designer, in an infringement and moral rights action relating to carpet designs.
  • Diligent Corporation v. Dilitrust SAS et al (Federal Court File No. T-1775-18) – representing an international software-as-a-service company in a trademark dispute in Canada, in conjunction with multi-jurisdictional litigation.  
  • 3Genius v. Locationary Inc. et al (Ont. Sup. Ct File No. CV-14-497239) – successfully representing the defendants in a dispute relating to ownership of software and a motion to compel millions of dollars of holdback funds into Court.  
  • Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT (Ont. Sup. Ct. File no. CV-312174; Federal Court File no. T-2520-93) – representing the Hungarian pharmaceutical company in a patent infringement action and a tort action against Apotex Inc.