Website_Hero_Abstact_Architectural_Ceiling_P_0089_Mono

18 November 202020 minute read

A closer look at the proposed responsible lending reform changes

We recently released an update regarding the Australian Government’s plan to, in effect, remove the current responsible lending obligations from the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) (NCCPA), other than for certain higher risk products (Proposed Reforms). You can read that update here, including our assessment of the impact the Proposed Reforms will have on lenders and other key industry players (including neo-banks and other fintechs looking to disrupt consumer credit).

The Government has since released draft legislation for the Proposed Reforms. The draft legislation was released on 4 November 2020 and is open for consultation until 20 November 2020.[1] In this update, we provide an overview of the draft legislation for the Proposed Reforms and what lenders and other key industry players may need to start considering in order to prepare for their implementation.

What is proposed

As expected, at a high-level, the draft legislation removes the existing responsible lending obligations from the NCCPA for credit contracts, except in relation to small amount credit contracts (SACCs), SACC-equivalent loans by ADIs and consumer leases. For all other credit, the Proposed Reforms will remove responsible lending obligations for ADIs, and instead impose lending standards for non-ADIs that reflect a new ‘risk-based’ regulatory framework for consumer credit. 

ADIs are already subject to the prudential regulatory framework under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth) that is administered by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). Removing the existing responsible lending obligations in the NCCPA for ADIs seeks to ensure that ADIs are no longer subject to two frameworks.

The suite of draft legislation for the Proposed Reforms includes:

  • NCCP (Supporting Economic Recovery) Bill 2020 (Bill);
  • NCCP (A new regulatory framework for the provision of consumer credit) Regulations 2020 (Regulations); and
  • Non-ADI Credit Standards (Standards).
An overview of the key changes
Proposed Reform
Overview
Commencement Date
Responsible lending obligations will only apply to SACCs, SACC-equivalent loans provided by ADIs and consumer leases

The existing responsible lending obligations in the NCCPA will only apply to SACCs, SACC-equivalent loans provided by ADIs and consumer leases. 

A SACC is essentially a credit contract (other than a continuing credit contract) where the credit limit is $2,000 or less, the term of the contract is between 16 days and 1 year and the debtor’s obligations under the contract are not secured (payday loans are usually a SACC).

This means that lenders that provide SACCs or consumer leases will need to continue to comply with the existing responsible lending obligations, including to make an assessment that the credit contract is ‘not unsuitable’ for the consumer.

1 March 2021
ADIs will not subject to responsible lending obligations A key change is that ADIs will no longer be subject to responsible lending obligations in the NCCPA. However, ADIs will need to continue to comply with the APRA prudential standards.  1 March 2021
Non-ADI credit will no longer be subject to responsible lending obligations and instead will need to comply with the Standards
Responsible lending obligations for non-ADIs have been removed by way of the Proposed Reforms. Instead, non-ADIs must comply with the Standards. Details of the Standards are set out later in this table.   1 March 2021

A ‘best interests’ duty will apply to all credit assistance providers 

The ‘best interests’ obligation that will apply to mortgage brokers from 1 January 2021 will be extended to other credit assistance providers (i.e. persons that are not the credit provider, but suggest credit products to consumers or assist consumers to apply for credit and do this in relation to credit contracts offered by more than one credit provider). 

This means that licensees that are credit assistance providers, and their representatives, must: 

  • act in the best interests of consumers when providing credit assistance in relation to credit contracts; and 
  • where there is a conflict of interests, give priority to consumers in providing credit assistance in relation to credit contracts. 

The draft legislation does not prescribe conduct that will be taken to satisfy the best interests duty. However, ASIC has already provided some guidance (for mortgage brokers) on how it expects this duty will be complied with, in ASIC Regulatory Guide 273 (which includes guidance around gathering appropriate information about the consumer and considering a range of relevant products). 

Licensees that authorise credit representatives will need to take reasonable steps to ensure that credit representatives comply with the obligations noted above. At a minimum, this will likely require licensees to impose contractual obligations on their representatives to comply with the duty and undertake appropriate monitoring and supervisory activities.

1 March 2021
New Standards for non-ADIs

The Standards enable non-ADIs to move towards a ‘risk-based’ lending that is intended to support increased competition, provide more efficient access to credit and remove prescriptive barriers for both lenders and borrowers.

Importantly, small business credit is excluded from the Standards (the credit must be genuinely for the purposes of a small business operated by the consumer). For mixed-use loans, this moves away from the requirement to assess the ‘predominant purpose’ of the loan.

The key features of the Standards are set out below. The Standards are intended to be similar to the draft APRA Prudential Standard (APS) 220 ‘Credit Risk Management’ which proposes revisions to the credit risk management framework for ADIs (APS 220 is currently open for consultation).[2]

Key features

Assessment criteria

The lender must have systems, policies and processes that are adequate to ensure they do not provide consumer credit unless the lender has established criteria that:

  • enable the lender to assess whether it is likely the consumer will be able to comply with their financial obligations under the contract without substantial hardship;
  • allow for the assessment to be proportionate to the nature, type and size of the credit; and
  • require the assessment to consider a range of specified factors, including the purpose of the credit, the structure of the credit and the consumer’s sources of repayment, risk profile, repayment history and reasonably foreseeable expenses.

Making the assessment

A lender must not provide consumer credit unless they have assessed (using their criteria) that the consumer will be able to comply with their financial obligations under the contract without substantial hardship.

When assessing the specified factors, the lender must obtain adequate information to undertake the assessment. The lender is entitled to rely on information provided by the consumer, unless there are reasonable grounds to believe it is unreliable. However, the lender must:

  • make reasonable inquiries, and take reasonable steps, to verify the consumer’s source(s) of repayment and risk profile;
  • make reasonable inquiries about the consumer’s expenses including, at the lender’s discretion, making reasonable estimates of those expenses; and
  • take reasonable steps to verify the accuracy and completeness of information provided about a consumer by a third party.

In the explanatory materials, it is suggested a lender may have reasonable grounds to believe that information is unreliable due to the content of the information provided or the circumstances or manner in which it is provided.

Prescribed pre-determined assessment

The Standards provide that a lender must determine that the consumer will not be able to comply with the credit contract without substantial hardship if:

  • the consumer could only comply with their financial obligations under the contract by selling their principal place of residence (and the consumer has no intention of selling their principal place of residence for this purpose at the time the assessment is made);
  • the consumer could only comply with their financial obligations under the contract by failing to meet their rental payments in relation to their principal place of residence; or
  • where the credit contract is a credit card contract, the consumer could not repay an amount equal to the credit limit within 3 years.

This effectively introduces objective criteria into the lender’s assessment process.

Other requirements

Lenders will be required to give a copy of their assessment to the relevant consumer if a request is made up to seven years after the date the credit contract was entered into or the credit limit was increased.

We expect this will be 1 March 2021 (the Standards note it as the later of the day after the Standards are registered, or immediately after the commencement of the Bill).

What your business needs to start considering

As the Proposed Reforms come into effect from 1 March 2021, lenders (particularly non-ADI lenders) will need to start thinking about any updates that need to be made (or can be made) to their systems and processes to ensure consistency and compliance with the Proposed Reforms, including the assessment criteria outlined in the Standards.

Although a key feature of the draft legislation is to increase borrower responsibility for providing adequate information to lenders, before a lender revises their current processes they will need to consider the following:

  • The appropriate thresholds for determining whether or not a consumer can repay a loan without ‘substantial hardship’ (including by reference to the circumstances prescribed in the Standards). 
  • How the lender will determine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe information provided by the consumer is reliable or not. This will likely require at least some level of assessment of the information provided and the circumstances in which it is provided. 
  • The processes the lender requires in order to make reasonable inquiries in respect of sources of repayment, consumer risk profiles and consumer expenses (and to verify information provided by a third party). We expect that at least some existing industry practices are likely to be maintained in order to meet these obligations, however an increasing culture of compliance may change this over time.
  • The lender’s other obligations, including the general obligation to ensure credit activities are engaged in efficiently, honestly and fairly and the upcoming design and distribution obligations. The latter in particular will require lenders to have processes in place to ensure credit products are distributed to consumers that fall within the defined target market. 
  • The lender’s own risk appetite and the level of inquiries they need to make to satisfy themselves that a loan fits into that risk appetite (so they do not unnecessarily incur or increase credit risk). 

Accordingly, while the reforms are intended to make it easier for lenders to provide credit, some level of inquiry by lenders will continue to be required. This may mean that, at least in the short term, a conservative view will be taken by some lenders. 

However, the ability to place greater reliance on information provided by consumers may be attractive to fintechs and other new entrants to the consumer credit space, including those who do not yet have an established responsible lending program (as there is an opportunity, under the Proposed Reforms, to build a more streamlined credit assessment process). 

We expect that the Proposed Reforms will allow some lenders to gain a competitive advantage, by offering a more simplified credit assessment process and by reducing the time needed to assess and extend credit. On the other hand, we expect that many incumbent players will not be able to ‘relax’ their current procedures to a material extent (or will simply choose not to do so), and we expect this will lead to a continuation of the general theme of greater competition in this area.

The Proposed Reforms have already been critically analysed in the media for the effect they may have from a consumer protection perspective, so the Government will no doubt take this into consideration in finalising its consultation process.

Next steps

Consultation on the Proposed Reforms is open until Friday 20 November 2020. Once the consultation period expires, the Government will take into consideration any submissions in finalising the legislation for the Proposed Reforms.

Please get in touch with us if you have any questions about how this legislation may impact your business, or if we can assist you in considering ways that your business may be able to prepare for these changes.



[1] Australian Treasury, ‘Consumer Credit Reforms’ (4 November 2020) <https://treasury.gov.au/consultation/c2020-124502>.

[2] Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, ‘APRA issues letter to ADIs on alignment of credit risk management reporting standard with prudential standard’ (28 October 2020) <https://www.apra.gov.au/news-and-publications/apra-issues-letter-to-adis-on-alignment-of-credit-risk-management-reporting>.

Print