Representative Cases

  • Barkan Wireless IP Holdings, L.P. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless – Represented Samsung in this patent infringement matter in the Eastern District of Texas regarding three patents relate to cellular networks. The case settled favorably before trial
  • Representing a US-based software company in managing its patent portfolio regarding cutting-edge human-computer interaction technologies
  • Represented a security systems company in successfully developing a litigation strategy to enforce licensed patent technology, and prevailed upon a fully-favorable claim construction
  • Certain Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Mask Systems and Components Thereof (337-TA-1136) – Represented ResMed and its entities in the ITC as part of a multijurisdictional suit in the US, UK, Germany, Australia and New Zealand regarding sleep apnea devices. The matter concluded favorably
  • Applied Signal Technology v. ViaSat et al: Represented plaintiff in Northern District of California patent litigation involving satellite signal processing technology. Case is ongoing
  • Vellata v. Oracle: Represented defendant in Central District of California patent litigation involving Internet telephony technology. Case settled after plaintiff dedicated its patents to the public
  • Hewlett-Packard v. Acer: Represented plaintiff in ITC trial involving patent for monitor resolution technology. Case settled after trial but before decision
  • Northrop Grumman v. ITT: Arbitration involving electronic countermeasures technology. Arbitration settled
  • New Medium Technologies, LLC v. Miranda Technologies, Inc.: Represented defendant in Northern District of Illinois in patent litigation involving video technology. Case settled on favorable terms prior to trial
  • Thomas v. EchoStar Satellite: Represented defendant in Western District of N.C. in patent litigation involving conditional access technology. The patent focused on smart card technologies for set top boxes. Case settled on favorable terms after grant of motion for summary judgment on laches and favorable Markman decision for defendant
  • Irdeto v. EchoStar Communications: Represented defendant in District of Colorado in patent litigation involving encryption technology. The patents focused on encryption key management and generation techniques. Case settled on favorable terms after summary judgment of non-infringement on main patent was upheld by Federal Circuit
  • Ryobi v. Porter-Cable: Represented defendant in Northern District of Illinois in patent litigation involving laser guide technology for power tools. Case settled on favorable terms prior to trial
  • Lewis v. Boss Media: Represented defendant in District of Nevada in patent litigation involving video technology. Case settled on favorable terms prior to trial
  • IPPV v. EchoStar: Represented defendant in District of Delaware. The patents focused on pseudorandom bit stream generation and conditional access system credit management techniques. Case settled on favorable terms after trial during pendency of appeal