Add a bookmark to get started

Pioneers in worldwide product liability compliance and defense

We help some of the world’s largest companies with their complex product liability issues. Our advice and litigation strategy are grounded in a multi-disciplinary, multi-jurisdictional approach. Whether entering new markets or general compliance advice or if you are facing mass tort, personal injury, consumer fraud, toxic tort or securities claims, or government inquiries, we help you to address the toughest challenges.

New product safety standards coupled with accelerating multijurisdictional litigation, including multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the US, and a greater focus on environmental issues have resulted in an increase of product liability class actions around the world.

We are positioned to defend claims of any size involving any industry around the globe. We advise on the legal issues associated with risk, compliance, and business management at every stage of the product development and supply chain lifecycle. We ensure you remain ahead of the curve when it comes to compliance with product safety legislation.

Our innovative approach to resolving claims goes beyond traditional litigation methods: we drive success through early actions in ways that protect our clients and strengthen the law. We serve as national and global pre-emption and resolution counsel to achieve groundbreaking legal victories, consistently resolve claims, and bring mass torts to an early end.

“Their strength is that they work as a team, you don't have individuals going out and trying to outshine others. They know their strengths and bring people in for all areas of mass torts, from science experts to coordinators”

Chambers 2021

Our lawyers have experience in the areas most likely to be of concern to manufacturers, distributors and suppliers. We’ve worked on materials restriction regulation, such as the REACH and RoHS legislation and waste and product life-cycle management legislation, such as EU legislation relating to WEEE and packaging waste. This can be broken down into three fields: bringing a product to market, products already in the market and product recalls. We advise extensively on all.

Our litigators include medical doctors and others who hold PhDs and advanced scientific and technical degrees. We use Daubert strategies in the US and leverage science-based arguments to attack claims and mitigate exposure. We translate complex information into compelling talking points that persuade opposing counsel and multi-jurisdictional judges and juries to agree with our position. Our relationships with the right expert witnesses result in a distinct advantage for your company.

Chambers and the Legal 500 rank us among the most highly regarded product liability lawyers in the world. We remain ever mindful of your company’s reputation when navigating you through product recalls, governmental investigations, insurance coverage and environmental concerns.

Awards and recognition

  • Recognized by BTI Litigation Outlook 2023 as a “Powerhouse” in Product Liability
  • Recognized by Legal 500 US 2022 in the categories of:
    • Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions: Toxic Tort – Defense
    • Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions: Consumer Products (including Tobacco)
    • Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices – Defense
    • Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions: Automotive/Transport
  • Recognized by Chambers USA 2022 in the category of Nationwide Product Liability & Mass Torts: The Elite


At DLA Piper, we view ourselves as “closers” of mass tort litigation.  We have an unparalleled track record of using cutting edge scientific or legal strategies to identify dispositive issues that, if successful, will allow the defense to bring the litigation to an early end through federal preemption, Daubert, or other motions.  In addition to talented lawyers, our team members also have medical and other advanced degrees that provide unique perspectives on mass tort matters. 

  • We are lead strategic and global coordination counsel in mass tort litigation involving Essure, a permanently implantable contraceptive device for women discontinued in 2018. On August 20, 2020, Bayer announced that it had resolved approximately 90% of the Essure filed and unfiled claims and that they company anticipated resolving the total Essure claims for $1.6 billion. This amount is significantly less than the potential exposure that may have resulted from receiving adverse verdicts at trial. Since resolving the US litigation, DLA Piper’s role has expanded into global coordinating counsel across twelve countries, resulting in a 100% success rate with more than 80 favorable outcomes from trial and appellate courts in France, Brazil, Spain, and Canada. 
  • Achieved a significant victory as national counsel for a global pharmaceutical company in federal and state consolidated litigation involving allegations that one of its medications, as well as other incretin-based therapies approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes, causes pancreatic cancer and pancreatitis. After more than seven years of litigation, we secured summary judgment on behalf of the client in both federal and state court proceedings on federal preemption and causation grounds. Our team prevailed on causation grounds by demonstrating that the science did not support the plaintiffs’ allegations and persuaded each court to exclude the plaintiffs’ proposed expert testimony. 
  • Achieved a significant Daubert victory as national counsel for a global pharmaceutical company, effectively ending 800+ plaintiff product liability MDLs in which the plaintiffs claimed that erectile dysfunction medications are associated with the progression of melanoma. 
  • We helped a global pharmaceutical company develop scientific defenses and a Daubert strategy to extricate the company from a mass tort litigation involving claims by 2,000+ plaintiffs who alleged that one of the company’s medications caused type 2 diabetes and other conditions. In a series of rulings, we obtained rulings excluding all of the plaintiffs’ causation experts, resulting in summary judgment for the company and dismissal of the entire MDL. The MDL court’s ruling was affirmed on appeal to the Fourth Circuit.
  • Representing a leading international automotive group in a mass litigation for warranty and damage claims relating to the specified exhaust gas values for diesel vehicles.
  • Coordinated advice from jurisdictions all over the globe in response to a request for assistance from a global FMCG organization in relation to its COVID-19 protocols. This has included advice on a wide range of measures including review of the systems and procedures it implemented at factories and offices in order to ensure to safety of the workforce and so that it could continue to place its consumers goods, approach to testing for COVID-19, and vaccinations. The purpose of this was to ensure that the client could continue to manufacture and place its goods on the market.
  • Advice to an international food manufacturer on local law requirements, across 36 countries, and risk management in relation to the presence of ethylene oxide in a food additive. The client requested advice on notification and recall obligations for products where the maximum residue level of ethylene oxide was above the level set at law in various countries, but there was no safety issue.
  • Advised on product safety requirements in relation to alarms systems, as well as any local law licensing requirements to sell specified products.
  • Advised a high-end perfume manufacturer on product compliance laws, specifically in relation to labelling and safety requirements, in a range of jurisdictions specifically in relation to toys, textiles and clothing. The advice included client sought advice on labelling requirements as well as safety requirements.
  • Advising a consumer electronics and household appliances company based in Seoul on a product safety issue and possible product recall for electronic devices. Coordinating strategy vis-à-vis authorities in almost all member states of the European Union and coordinating the global strategy.
  • Advising a German car manufacturer on the permissibility under product law of a new light system for vehicles in 88 jurisdictions worldwide.
  • Representing an automobile and motorbike manufacturer in product liability and warranty infringement proceedings with hundreds of cases in numerous states.
  • Advising a technology company on product safety issues, in particular on notification obligations and actions to be taken as a result of a relevant risk in relation to a fitness tracker. Coordinating numerous other jurisdictions in Europe, Asia and South America.
  • Lead counsel on behalf of a global chemical company in the largest ongoing multidistrict litigation suit in the US related to PFAS exposure, involving more than 10,000 plaintiffs spanning across over 10 states



At the Intersection of Science and Law

Featured insights