I think the next wave of litigation is going to be the more interesting one, the product liability and the alleged negligence claims.
— Danny Tobey
AI and algorithm-driven technologies are increasingly at the center of high-stakes disputes. From social media addiction claims and alleged AI-driven price manipulation to overstated marketing of AI capabilities in securities filings, these technologies create novel and complex legal challenges that span consumer protection, antitrust, and securities litigation. Understanding enforcement trends, liability exposure, and dispute resolution strategies requires specialized experience in both the science that lies behind the technology and the litigation.
Who’s responsible when algorithms fail? Navigating AI ownership & liability
Tuesday, March 18, 2025 | 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm CT
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is impacting companies across industries in nearly every facet of life. With products increasingly incorporating AI and becoming more complex, we re-examine traditional liability frameworks in the context of this new technology.
Please join DLA Piper litigation attorneys as they share the trends in AI disputes, detail the issues, and outline the challenges on the horizon. We hope you can join us.
Featured insights
Proving Admissibility of AI Outputs Centers on Authenticity
As AI technology continues to evolve, so too will the legal frameworks governing admissibility in court. Understanding the nuances of authentication and reliability as well as hearsay will be essential when dealing with AI-generated evidence.
Read more
Courts Must Stick To The Science On Digital Addiction Claims
In recent years, there has been an ongoing series of personal injury and product liability lawsuits alleging that the use of certain digital products and services is causing plaintiffs to develop behavioral addictions, including to social media and video games.
Read moreCompanies across sectors that use artificial intelligence in their business may face new challenges from AI-related disputes.
— John Gibson
